👎 Useless Ursus, Altaguetta, Syberite, and Durham Duffer are the Fucktards of Massage Planet

[snoopdoggie]

Let's all put these 4 Fucktards on ignore, so that they can only argue amongst themselves, and leave the rest of us alone.
Thanks.

 

[Hornet]

I have one of them on ignore already. I’ll give you a hint which one: He’s a brainwashed extreme right-wing sheeple and Donald Trump’s personal fluffer that once you counter his position with facts and he has no come back he just says “F### You” then tries to distract with other lies from extreme right wing sources with no credibility whatsoever.

 

[xtc27]

I have one of them on ignore already. I’ll give you a hint which one: He’s a brainwashed extreme right-wing sheeple and Donald Trump’s personal fluffer that once you counter his position with facts and he has no come back he just says “F### You” then throes to distract with other lies from extreme right wing sources with no credibility whatsoever.

...u didnt narrow it down much!

 

[BmH6769]

You’re missing Back in Toronto

 

[OG_funguy]

Let's all put these 4 Fucktards on ignore, so that they can only argue amongst themselves, and leave the rest of us alone.
Thanks.

There's a few worse than these guys...at least they stay confined in only certain threads and don't spew their shit all over the place.

 

[Sybarite]

Haha arguing too much??!! Seriously? Have you looked at your post count? Who is debating more than you?

This is how you respond when someone keeps on pointing out how spectacularly wrong and hypocritical you are with half the endless amount of stupid stuff you post?? Take your toys and go home? Why am I not surprised?!

OK if you can't take the heat, get out the kitchen. I get it: it's embarrassing, and it will feel better if you put someone on ignore and then you don't need to be painfully reminded that what you said was really idiotic or completely false, yet again.

But seriously if you don't want to be corrected on the most basic factual errors, stop posting stuff like this...

you're an old dog who can't be educated.

Buddy boy, you have very much to learn.

You should be more educated.
May I suggest, before you go on a rant and question the knowledge of someone who has been following world politics since 6th grade, learn something before you speak.

Face it, you want to talk a big game about politics etc. but when someone points out the ridiculousness of what you're saying this is how you lash out. Sad.

Perhaps instead of putting people on ignore you could just man up and admit when you're wrong....

 

[Sybarite]

And what did Durham Duffer ever do? You are so random!

Please let us know what his crimes against your ego were.

 

[snoopdoggie]

...u didnt narrow it down much!

Yeah, there's a few more. But I sometimes give people second chances. Those 4 that I mentioned are the ones that have gone way overboard and I have lost all patience with them.

Michael is one that I didn't put on ignore yet. Some of his posts just make me laugh. He doesn't argue with me, so he shouldn't get an ignore from me.

Roman was another one I put on ignore from before. He seemed to dispute everything I said. But I noticed he doesn't come here as much as before.

 

[UsefulIdiot]

I have one of them on ignore already. I’ll give you a hint which one: He’s a brainwashed extreme right-wing sheeple and Donald Trump’s personal fluffer that once you counter his position with facts and he has no come back he just says “F### You” then tries to distract with other lies from extreme right wing sources with no credibility whatsoever.

Me too. I really hate that I had to put him on ignore and he is the only one so far. I believe it is good to hear differing opinions, even if they are highly offensive. Occasionally they do make a good point or I am forced to examine my own assumptions. I prefer open conversation, but if the conversation turns into a Gish Gallop or an exchange of insults then at that point engaging with such people is a waste of time.

 

[UsefulIdiot]

I've never heard "gish gallop" ???

Another poster (@imthedude) used the term on this forum and I like it a lot:

"The Gish gallop is a term for an eristic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments". Wikipedia

 

[imthedude]

I think people are conflating Sybarite with sy barite again...

 

[Blue.eyes.white.dragon]

You’re missing Back in Toronto

I fucking hate that guy.

 

[Sybarite]

I think people are conflating Sybarite with sy barite again...

It’s true a lot of people get myself and @sy barite mixed up because our user names are almost identical, even though we are completely different people, but this is one of the very few things Snoopy is not confused about…

Snoopy is pissed because even though he posts more than pretty much anyone on this board, he doesn’t like people arguing with him or disputing any of the crazy things he says, as he just admitted in his last post.

I don’t agree with Ursus about a ton of things, but Ursus was completely correct about Obama being against gay marriage in his first term. It’s just a simple fact. Snoopy (who previously posted over and over again about how much he hates gay marriage) replied to Ursus as follows…

Ha ha ha. You're so stupid, only the opposite is true. Obama was never against gay marriage. Dump Trump has always been opposed to it.

If Obama was against gay marriage, he never would have been nominated.

So I pointed out to Snoopy he was incorrect about that, as follows…

Ursus is correct about that - please read about it. Like yourself, Obama was against gay marriage and was open about his opposition to gay marriage in his 2008 campaign when he was originally elected. Biden was very instrumental in getting Obama to change his position on gay marriage. Hopefully like Obama you've similarly evolved.

By the time of his Senate run in 2004, he said he supported civil unions and domestic partnerships for same-sex partners but opposed same-sex marriages.[242] In 2008, he reaffirmed this position by stating "I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage."[243] On May 9, 2012, shortly after the official launch of his campaign for re-election as president, Obama said his views had evolved, and he publicly affirmed his personal support for the legalization of same-sex marriage, becoming the first sitting U.S. president to do so.[244][245]

Barack Obama - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You're incorrect about Trump too... as a former Democrat Trump is all over the map and doesn't really seem to have any policy positions beyond what is good for him in the moment, but there is definitely evidence he's fine with gay marriage...

in November 2016, a few days after he was elected president, Trump suggested that he did not, after all, plan to nominate justices who would overturn the Obergefell ruling. He told Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes his personal view on same-sex marriage was "irrelevant," that he was "fine with" same-sex marriage, and that the Obergefell decision had "settled" the matter[158][164] (though some expressed skepticism that he had really changed his position).[165]

In 2019, his counselor and spokeswoman Kellyanne Conway claimed that he approves of same-sex marriage.[166]

Social policy of the first Donald Trump administration - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So instead of replying in that thread, being a man and just admitting he’s completely wrong (yet again), he starts this thread calling me a “fucktard.”

This is the way you would expect a child to respond.

As they say: When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Looking forward to hearing all about why everyone should be putting Durham Duffer on ignore!

 

[cupcrazy]

I am surprised Michael777 or whitesnake are not in your list

 

[Toucan]

It’s true a lot of people get myself and @sy barite mixed up because our user names are almost identical, even though we are completely different people, but this is one of the very few things Snoopy is not confused about…

Snoopy is pissed because even though he posts more than pretty much anyone on this board, he doesn’t like people arguing with him or disputing any of the crazy things he says, as he just admitted in his last post.

I don’t agree with Ursus about a ton of things, but Ursus was completely correct about Obama being against gay marriage in his first term. It’s just a simple fact. Snoopy (who previously posted over and over again about how much he hates gay marriage) replied to Ursus as follows…



So I pointed out to Snoopy he was incorrect about that, as follows…



So instead of replying in that thread, being a man and just admitting he’s completely wrong (yet again), he starts this thread calling me a “fucktard.”

This is the way you would expect a child to respond.

As they say: When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Looking forward to hearing all about why everyone should be putting Durham Duffer on ignore!

I have to give where credit is due. Although you and I differ politically and I may very much disagree with your stance, I do very much appreciate the linguistic sophistication and the use of eloquent vocabulary and suscinctness in your political arguments. This is a fleeting skill, regardless of what political affiliation people may have.

 

[Sybarite]

I have to give where credit is due. Although you and I differ politically and I may very much disagree with your stance, I do very much appreciate the linguistic sophistication and the use of eloquent vocabulary and suscinctness in your political arguments. This is a fleeting skill, regardless of what political affiliation people may have.

Thanks Toucan I appreciate it. I believe we might be more sympatico than it appears.

 

[Sybarite]

I am surprised Michael777 or whitesnake are not in your list

It's because it's not about who is the most annoying or who posts way too much useless stuff: Snoopy should be on the top of that list himself.

This thread is about who Snoopy has a personal grudge with because he gets upset and his feelings are hurt if anyone disagrees with any of his ten zillion posts.

This is the guy who used to love Trump who now posting like crazy saying Trump is a sore loser... the irony!

 

[Shag]

It’s true a lot of people get myself and @sy barite mixed up because our user names are almost identical, even though we are completely different people, but this is one of the very few things Snoopy is not confused about…

Snoopy is pissed because even though he posts more than pretty much anyone on this board, he doesn’t like people arguing with him or disputing any of the crazy things he says, as he just admitted in his last post.

I don’t agree with Ursus about a ton of things, but Ursus was completely correct about Obama being against gay marriage in his first term. It’s just a simple fact. Snoopy (who previously posted over and over again about how much he hates gay marriage) replied to Ursus as follows…



So I pointed out to Snoopy he was incorrect about that, as follows…



So instead of replying in that thread, being a man and just admitting he’s completely wrong (yet again), he starts this thread calling me a “fucktard.”

This is the way you would expect a child to respond.

As they say: When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Looking forward to hearing all about why everyone should be putting Durham Duffer on ignore!

Did you ever think he may be admin also?

I second the thought about DD. Didn't he use to post reviews way back on terb, when it was around.

 

[Deleted member 73937]

I am surprised Michael777 or whitesnake are not in your list

you beat me to it.

And i am surprised about Durham Duffer. I always found him reasonable although he did call me out for suggesting tongue in cheek that Donald J Trump commit hari kari

 

[imthedude]

It’s true a lot of people get myself and @sy barite mixed up because our user names are almost identical, even though we are completely different people, but this is one of the very few things Snoopy is not confused about…

Fair enough. I actually have on ignore but mainly because, at least around the time I did it (must have been '19) his posting pattern seemed to be primarily a bottomless well of questions and no reviews or intel, which defeats the purpose of this community, and which, when he was called out on, he'd flip out about. I probably wouldn't have seen this thread had I not been tagged lol